January 15, 2008
INDEED
You know you're a blogging family when you're faced with an ethical dilemma and your husband's advice is "What would Glenn Reynolds do?"
Posted by: Sarah at
04:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
DAYAKS
Some of us SpouseBUZZers are reading the book
The Airmen and the Headhunters for an upcoming author interview. I am thoroughly enjoying this book, and it's just starting to get really exciting.
I don't want to spoil anything, but there's one event that I can't get out of my head. The Dayak people have finally decided that the only way to protect the American airmen is to start fighting back against the Japanese. But they needed a foolproof trap, so the Dayak leader asks the most beautiful young girls in the village to bathe naked in the river to distract the Japanese soldiers long enough for an attack. Nudity is not acceptable in Dayak society, but the young girls did it anyway to help protect the airmen. They laid the trap for the Japanese.
I have been thinking about how it must've pained the Dayak leader to ask the young women to do this. I have imagined my father asking me to expose myself in the middle of town for the greater good. I can't imagine asking so much from a young girl. And I've also tried to put myself in the girls' shoes, letting go of their shame in order to save lives by facilitating the taking of other lives. But if I could run naked through the streets of Baghdad, and it saved just one soldier's life, it would be worth it.
Maybe we should add Girls Gone Wild to the Surge?
Posted by: Sarah at
03:55 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Isn't it an awesome, inspiring, and wonderful book to read right now when there seems to be such a dearth of books with anything hopeful in them?
I know just the scene you are talking about - and it was very moving. The Dayaks risked and sacrificed so much for our boys...
Posted by: airforcewife at January 15, 2008 08:53 AM (mIbWn)
2
That sounds like a really great book. If I wasn't in the middle of 43 others, I might look into reading it.
Posted by: Erin at January 16, 2008 05:12 PM (y67l2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 14, 2008
LUCKY
It sounds like
Tim and Patti had a good day. I got this email from him tonight:
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:58:22 -0500
From: tim
To: sarah
Subject: Just to Make You Jealous...
...I shook hands with Fred today.
Tee Hee
Tim
Too cool.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:06 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
MERGING BACK ONTO THE EXPRESSWAY
In three weeks, my husband joins the Army. No, really. For the past year and a half (two and a half if you ask him; he doesn't consider his time in Finance to be "the Army") he has been in Army schools. Life has been super easy on us. But all that changes in three weeks: he'll get assigned to a battalion and then find out which continent he's deploying to and when. Life's about to get interesting again.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:39 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Fingers crossed all goes smoothly!
We're here for you and the Mr. no matter what that paperwork says.
Posted by: Guard Wife at January 14, 2008 12:03 PM (BslEQ)
2
Of course, what is REALLY important is that Mr. Husband puts in enough hours for that coveted PowerPoint Ranger patch before going back to the "real Army". It's 1000 hours+ and highly competitive.
He made it, right?
I'll never forget the tears in my eyes when Air Force Guy got his...
Posted by: airforcewife at January 14, 2008 12:22 PM (mIbWn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DONE
Erin's baby present is now in the mail.
A couple of people have acted a little shocked that I would wrap yarn around needles for 36 hours when there's a chance that the adoption could still fall through. But Erin and I discussed this a long time ago, right when they found out that getting this baby would be a possibility. I told her that I wasn't going to treat her any differently than if the baby were in her tummy, because nobody looks you in the face when you're pregnant and says, "I'm not going to invest my time or money until the baby pops out and is real." I said I'd treat her the same way I would be treated as a pregnant lady, which in hindsight seems ironic, since her baby is more real than mine was. But I never wanted her to feel different about being an adoptive mommy.
And I had a couple of people sock me in the gut with an I-told-you-so attitude, like I was some halfwit who had never considered a miscarriage but somehow they had glorious wisdom all along that it could happen to me. Those people are lucky we weren't in the same room when they mouthed off. If anything bad happens to Erin and something falls through, anyone who says anything even remotely condescending is going to have to answer to me. I will straight up punch them in the larynx.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:25 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 244 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"I will straight up punch them in the larynx."
Posted by: tim at January 14, 2008 10:47 AM (nno0f)
2
Aw, Sarah. Either I've rubbed off on you or you on me (or maybe our soldier husbands on both of us?) as I say I will punch someone in the throat AT LEAST twice a day and wish I could do so at least twice as often.
I am superstitious to the nth degree, but I think as long as the expecting mom is on board, it's never too early to give a gift (or a dozen!).
I don't even know Erin & yet, *I'm* excited about all her excitement! I'm trusting she will post photos of her present!?
Posted by: Guard Wife at January 14, 2008 12:01 PM (BslEQ)
3
Man, I freakin' love you. Now if only all the other people in my life could think like you do.
Posted by: Erin at January 14, 2008 01:00 PM (y67l2)
4
Ditto to Tim's comment. BIG ditto.
Posted by: MaryIndiana at January 14, 2008 03:35 PM (lvDF0)
5
Uh, oh, all I can think is, I hope I'm not one of those people who would say something so insensitive...
Posted by: Kate at January 16, 2008 04:21 AM (JIGe1)
6
I have said it before, but I'll say it again, I love ya! You rock! And so on

Don't worry, if anyone does that to Erin, or you again, I will be standing in the wings with more ammo than anyone could imagine! I am that just that mean, even though I can't get anyone to believe me when I say it outloud! LOL
Anyway, hugs to you, hugs to Erin. May the evil forces fly away - to never return!!
Posted by: LMT at January 16, 2008 09:26 AM (y9taJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 13, 2008
PERSPECTIVE
Erin called me this morning to talk about me, my feelings, my life, my stuff. And then later in the conversation she reminded me of the date. All of a sudden I burst into tears, realizing once again how small and petty my own stuff is.
Today is not about me.
And so I sit here today with tears on my cheeks, thankful for all I have and thankful for men like Gunnar Becker.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:48 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah.....
Thank you, for remembering....
we are truely blessed, to have friends, like Erin & you, in our lives......The days go by, and life somehow goes on, but our memories of Gunnar never fade............
debey
Posted by: debey at January 13, 2008 10:40 AM (83TNL)
2
What a nice group of sites these links take you too. Thanks for the introduction to Gunnar and those he worked with--what a wonderful young man.
Posted by: Guard Wife at January 13, 2008 11:50 AM (BslEQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 11, 2008
WAITING WIVES
Last night on SpouseBUZZ Talk Radio, Andi and AirForceWife interviewed two military wives: Stephanie from
She Who Waits and Elaine, a Vietnam-era Army wife. It was so interesting to hear what life was like for the "waiting wives" of Vietnam.
My favorite story was when Elaine said that, because she has epilepsy, the doctor told her that she could inform the Army of her condition and her husband wouldn't have to go overseas. Elaine said she went home from the doctor and never told her husband the info. She knew he was a soldier and she wasn't going to be the one to prevent him from doing his job. What a lady!
If you want to listen to the archive, it will be available here at Blog Talk Radio.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:21 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
January 10, 2008
HEY, GREEN, LOOK WHAT I DID!
I took some before and after pictures, but Charlie was definitely not cooperating. And let's face it, I'm just not so good at taking a picture of myself and the dog with the tripod and timer.

And afterwards, well, I just smelled like eyebrow wax. Which to a dog is quite a curious thing.

I was able to donate 13 1/2 inches, and since the hair salon I went to was a partnered up with Locks of Love, the haircut was free!
And the husband approves. He says it makes me look 30, which I will take as a compliment.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:36 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The cut looks great! It makes you look so different!
Posted by: Kasey at January 10, 2008 10:18 AM (tttDj)
Posted by: stuffed at January 10, 2008 11:14 AM (oI9wm)
3
oh.my.god.
It looks freakin' amazing. I think that is my favorite hair cut on you, by far.
Posted by: Erin at January 10, 2008 11:21 AM (y67l2)
4
Wow Sarah, it looks fantastic!
Posted by: Stephanie at January 10, 2008 12:09 PM (kzbE/)
5
Wonderful!!! It looks fabulous Sarah!
Posted by: Teresa at January 10, 2008 01:04 PM (rVIv9)
6
Oh My Goodness! I love the cut! You look super cute and stylish! Makes me want to head to the salon ...
Posted by: Rachel at January 10, 2008 02:22 PM (D2g4X)
7
I love it! Your long hair was beautiful, but the new cut is absolutely adorable. Locks of Love is great, too.
Posted by: Lorie Byrd at January 10, 2008 07:38 PM (IqI5e)
8
I love it! You look so cute and sassy! Great style for you. You did a good job of picking out a style for yourself.
Love,
Mama
Posted by: Nancy at January 10, 2008 08:43 PM (i47jP)
9
Wonderful! Very nice, and you look much closer to your age.
Posted by: FbL at January 10, 2008 08:56 PM (rW1/8)
10
WoW! I love it. Having cut my hair about that much 13 months ago, I can definitely say there is something to be said for having shorter hair.
You look great!
Posted by: Butterfly Wife at January 11, 2008 04:07 AM (mtySW)
11
I love it! And as the mother in law and aunt of cancer ladies, thanks for the long locks.
Posted by: Ruth H at January 11, 2008 08:16 AM (XZkH5)
12
What a wonderful haircut! You look great! As for locks of love. What a great program!
Posted by: Lemon Stand at January 12, 2008 02:18 AM (GAC+X)
13
Sarah, you look beautiful

. I wish I could stand to grow my hair long enough to be able to donate it!
Posted by: Kate at January 12, 2008 01:11 PM (rBKNq)
Posted by: wendy at January 12, 2008 01:22 PM (56tHP)
Posted by: MaryIndiana at January 12, 2008 09:24 PM (NaRfI)
16
That's a great cut on you! You look awesome!
Posted by: Calista at January 13, 2008 06:36 AM (iG82Z)
17
It's a shock at first, but a good one. You look great.
However, I will still think of you when we watch Lord of the Rings...in a good way.
Posted by: Vonn at January 13, 2008 08:17 PM (L56+J)
18
THAT'S AWESOME! I have created a monster! MUAHAHAHA
Posted by: Green at January 14, 2008 07:44 PM (Q8/Tc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
AWWWW
Yes, I am so shameless that I am going to link to a
post about how awesome I am. But it feels good to be loved. And Erin takes better pics of my handiwork than I do.
Thanks, Erin, I could use the pick-me-up today.
Speaking of which, this morning I was reminded of two of my favorite things: Weezer and baby animals.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:02 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh my god, that is the cutest little stuffed animal! where did you find out about making them?
Posted by: Kate at January 12, 2008 01:12 PM (rBKNq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
COLORBLIND LYNCHING?
I heard on the news this morning about the golf commentator who made a joke about
lynching Tiger Woods. I don't know what to make of it all, but one thing I did notice is that, if you look at the video, she obviously has no idea that she just said something offensive. There was no wincing, no wide eyes, no recognition whatsoever that she realized that she had just said something that could be construed as racist. None.
So what I wonder is this: isn't that progress? Is there something to the fact that a white woman could quip about lynching someone and have no notion of the racial overtones of what she said? I don't know, I'm really asking. It seems to me that it is a type of colorblindness to publicly make a comment like that. If she had any inkling that what she was saying was racist, she would've immediately reacted, I think. It's like she really didn't associate lynchings with black people. Heck, in a weird way, that's a good thing, right?
A colorblind lynching comment. How absurd. Makes me think of the South Park flag:

I don't know what this means to people. I think the comment was in a different category altogether than Imus, and I genuninely don't think she meant to be racist. And Tiger Woods laughed it off too.
But Al Sharpton licked his chops and got ready for the cameras. Sigh.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:36 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 245 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm actually quite sick to death of the constant pointing to the fact that Sen. Clinton has a vagina and it's "about time we had a female president" and the references to Obama's ethnicity -- for the same reasons you mention about the Tiger Woods episode.
People don't hate the Senators because of gender or ethnicity - that's not an issue. I have no doubt that we'd elect a female or black president without thinking twice... if they were qualified. But I absolutely HATE the insinuation that because I would not vote for either of them I'm either a misogynist or a racist. I am neither. It's the POLITICS, stupid.
Gah.
Posted by: airforcewife at January 10, 2008 05:47 AM (mIbWn)
2
There is obviously no free speech in this country any more. The 'lynch' remark had about as much to do with race as it did peanut butter: nada.
These people astound me.
Posted by: pam at January 10, 2008 05:53 AM (l6NIn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CAN YOU BELIEVE THE GALL?
This is really rich. Mahatma Gandhi's grandson says that Jews just need to
get over the Holocaust:
It is a very good example of a community can overplay a historic experience to the point that it begins to repulse friends. The holocaust was the result of the warped mind of an individual who was able to influence his followers into doing something dreadful. But, it seems to me the Jews today not only want the Germans to feel guilty but the whole world must regret what happened to the Jews. The world did feel sorry for the episode but when an individual or a nation refuses to forgive and move on the regret turns into anger.
You know who else is one individual that the whole world regrets what happened to? And who gets "overplayed"? Gandhi.
What an a-hole.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:52 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Have you ever seen the statements made by Gandhi himself about the Holocaust? He said the Jews could only keep the high ground if they marched willingly to their deaths. Eventually the Germans would see the error of their ways, said Gandhi.
Whatever. There is a vast difference between the British Empire and the Nazi war machine.
And Iran, for that matter.
Posted by: airforcewife at January 10, 2008 05:43 AM (mIbWn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 09, 2008
WELL SAID
Definitely go read this article today,
Great (American) Expectations. Excerpt:
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is chided for not moving legislation quickly enough through Parliament. But the very essence of a real parliament, as opposed to a rubber stamp, is gridlock. Have Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, with nothing worse to overcome than their Republican opposition, done better in their first year in the majority than Mr. Maliki, who must run a government besieged by al Qaeda and Iranian-backed militias?
From The Wall Street Journal's offices in New York City, one can look down at Ground Zero, still mostly a huge pit after more than six years during which its reconstruction, now in its umpteenth design iteration, was supposed to have been the signal proof that Americans would rebuild--better, taller, prouder.
Also across the way is the hulk of the old Deutsche Bank building, critically damaged on 9/11 and slated for destruction. In an attempt to ensure that not even trace levels of asbestos and other unpalatable elements would escape the wreck, a meticulous plan was devised to dismantle the building floor by floor, at a price exceeding that of its construction. In August a fire broke out, and two firefighters died after getting lost in the maze of internal scaffolding erected to keep the asbestos in. Those brave men lost their lives for the sake of an EPA standard, and there's been no work to speak of on the building since. It's a case of the perfect becoming the enemy--the mortal enemy--of the good.
And the rest is just as good.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:58 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 265 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm afraid some conservatives are acting like the EPA, looking for the perfect. That may not benefit the good, to quote your quote - It's a case of the perfect becoming the enemy--the mortal enemy--of the good. Not a perfect analogy but it hit a chord in my mind.
Posted by: Ruth H at January 09, 2008 12:42 PM (XZkH5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 08, 2008
I'M A FUNNY GIRL
Earlier tonight, I mentioned to my husband how lucky we are that we have nearly the same taste in movies, music, and TV. I asked him, "When's the last time I dragged you to a chick movie?" He couldn't think of anything, until I laughed and said that, ironically, I'm usually the one saying, "Can we please see
Die Hard/
Terminator/
Rambo?" and he's the one who reluctantly agrees. I like westerns, kung fu, and action movies probably a little more than he does.
I got my husband Street Fighter and Return of Street Fighter for Christmas, mostly so I could watch them. I'm a funny girl.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:45 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, at least you'll have a surrogate husband in my husband when your husband deploys...;-) My husband doesn't like slapstick comedies like I do, and chick flicks...never. I love it that he is on night shift now, because I was able to rent a long await DVD of Queer As Folk, which he could never watch in a million years!
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at January 08, 2008 03:27 PM (Ijp/q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 07, 2008
UPDATES
Butterfly Wife
updated that she sent out her 696th card to wounded soldiers at Landstuhl. Not too shabby. So I thought I'd give a little update.
To break the monotony of baby knitting, I have thrown in a square or two.

These 12 will be sent off to Heather for Hand-Crafted Comfort, her organization that assembles afghans for the wounded at Walter Reed. I haven't kept track of how many I've made total, but I am keeping track of certain colors because I am trying to make enough to provide an entire afghan. I've made 35 so far towards my own blanket. And isn't this just the greatest way to make a project: I do the fun stuff and then mail everything to Heather so she can assemble them, sew them together, weave in ends, and cut tails? Awesome. Why can't all my projects be like that?
And someone else mentioned the other day that we haven't had a pupdate in a while.

This morning, Charlie had an upset stomach. Apparently he decided the best thing to do was to go all the way downstairs, crawl under the Christmas tree, barf, and then lay down in it. Our dog's a genius.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:00 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 2 kb.
1
That's funny, because I just finished a post at my site about my crochet addiction and just happened to link you.
Yarn=Crack, I swear!!
Posted by: Raging Mom at January 07, 2008 06:37 AM (l+Chn)
2
I like the weaving and sewing. I think I'm alone in that. Cute pup.
Posted by: stuffed at January 07, 2008 10:02 AM (oI9wm)
3
oh wow, I love to crochet!! I can't believe I stumbled upon your blog today of all days, when I just finished my last project!!
Posted by: Erin at January 07, 2008 03:35 PM (79ptc)
4
thanks for the pup photo! cute as ever.
Posted by: jennifer at January 07, 2008 03:58 PM (NiWTj)
5
Keep up the great work.
Charlie is so cute. I am sure you must do like I do when they are sick and silly at the same time: love him.
Posted by: Butterfly Wife at January 07, 2008 04:36 PM (K0acE)
6
There's just something to love about the silliness that is dogs, isn't there? I'm not a fan of barfing, and Ike's got the most sensitive stomach I've ever seen. If we give him anything other than Pedigree for Fat Asses and chicken broth, he vomits and craps copiously.
And do we chuck him out for a model with less barfiness? Naaah, we clean it up in an irritated manner and laugh at the way he puts himself in the corner in shame.
Gotta love dogs.
Posted by: airforcewife at January 08, 2008 04:31 AM (mIbWn)
Posted by: Badger 6 at January 08, 2008 08:44 AM (n3eEc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 06, 2008
IT GOES THE OTHER WAY TOO
Kayt sent me a very touching article today:
The Blank Space in our Family Album
We just finished watching True Romance, one of my favorite movies of all time. And one of the beginning lines held new meaning for me during this viewing:
I kept asking Clarence why our world seemed to be collapsing and everything seemed so shitty. And he'd say, "That's the way it goes, but don't forget, it goes the other way too."
Here's to hope that it goes the other way too...
Posted by: Sarah at
04:13 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
CHANGE
We watched the Democrats debate last night. How tired am I of the phrase "But let me first say..."? They get asked a direct question and given 30 seconds to answer, and they say, "But let me first say..." and go on some tangent and never answer the original question.
There was also a mini-exposé about how Social Security will run out in 2017 and Medicare will run out in 2013, so what do you suggest to do about it as president? All of them answered that the solution to the problem was...change. They are all pro-change. They actively and vociferously support change. Problem is, they never exactly said what it was they planned to change in order to make us stop running out of money. They completely didn't answer the question.
Vodkapundit clowned on 'em in his drunkblogging:
9:00pm Did you know that Hillary has experience? Experience with change? Change that only her experience, her experience with change, can bring about? And that sheÂ’s a woman, a woman bringing change with her experience of womanness? Yeah, me neither.
Roger L. Simon has decided we must ban the word change from English.
The whole exchange was so meaningless that it reminded me of the presidential debate on Futurama:
John Jackson: It's time someone had the courage to stand up and say: I'm against those things that everybody hates.
Jack Johnson: Now, I respect my opponent. I think he's a good man. But quite frankly, I agree with everything he just said.
Are we there yet?
Posted by: Sarah at
06:04 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 257 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I also heard Huckabee use the word change over and over (and over) - and yet, he was vague as to what form change should come in. I don't trust that guy for some reason.
Posted by: Erin at January 06, 2008 07:26 AM (y67l2)
2
I liked the format very, very much. Much better than the other debates. I did learn something from the debates, not so much on substance (wha? is a debate supposed to be about substance), but watching the candidates interact with one another in a less-restrictive forum was instructive for me. Very instructive.
I also thought Charlie Gibson did a good job of fading into the background. Much better than some of the more ego-centric moderators we've had thrust on us in the past.
Posted by: Andi at January 06, 2008 08:47 AM (c5pOd)
3
I'm also beginning to think the debates are just an elaborate drinking game. Change? Drink up!
I did like Fred Thompson for not knowing about anchorman desk jacket syndrome. It's nice to see anyone appear less than perfectly polished.
Maybe next time there will be enough content to distract me from rumpled jackets and the desire for liquor. Eh, maybe not.
Posted by: stuffed at January 06, 2008 02:43 PM (oI9wm)
4
Life Imitates 'Saturday Night Live'
* "With our experience, we're gonna have ideas for change combinations that probably haven't occurred to you. If you have a 50-dollar bill, we can give you 50 singles. . . . We can give you 49 and 10 dimes. We can give you 25 twos. Come talk to us. . . . We are not going to give you change that you don't want. If you come to us with a hundred-dollar bill, we're not going to give you 2,000 nickels . . . unless that meets your particular change needs. We will give you the change equal to the amount of money that you want change for! At First Citiwide Change Bank, Our business is making change. That's what we do."--"Saturday Night Live" ad parody, Oct. 8, 1988
* "I want to make change, but I've already made change. I will continue to make change. I'm not just running on a promise of change. I'm running on 35 years of change. I'm running on having taken on the drug companies and the health insurance c*mpanies, taking on the oil companies. So, you know, I think it is clear that what we need is somebody who can deliver change. And we don't need to be raising the false hopes of our country about what can be delivered. The best way to know what change I will produce is to look at the changes that I've already made."--Hillary Clinton, Jan. 5, 2008
http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110011095
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at January 08, 2008 10:01 AM (9sj6x)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 05, 2008
KISS UP
Wyoming held its caucus today. (Did you even know that? I didn't. Iowa stole the show.) Romney got most of the delegates, but this quote from
the article rankled me a tad:
"Number one, he campaigned here," delegate Leigh Vosler of Cheyenne said of Romney. "I think that helped while some other candidates ignored us. But also he's the right person for the job."
Am I the only one who thinks that it's sad that people will vote for someone just because he kissed up to them? I have not gotten a single piece of mail, email, or phonecall from any candidate at all, so I based my choice on reading articles and opinion pieces from people I respect and watching the debates. I don't need a candidate to come suck up to me and shake my hand in a diner to make me want to vote for him.
Politics is so fascinating...and so disgusting.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:33 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't think this is much different than the early studies on management when productivity increased simply b/c management expressed concern over lighting. People will support someone who expresses an interest in them. It's human nature - act like you care about me and I'll do almost anything for you.
Posted by: MP at January 05, 2008 11:21 PM (zXAER)
2
Yep, the face time is important. Why should people vote for someone who, despite supposedly having similar goals and outlooks, doesn't bother to acknowledge your presence?
Posted by: Ted at January 06, 2008 03:16 AM (yRolC)
3
But, Ted, there are 300 million Americans. Surely we can't all expect individual face time?
I don't know, it just seems phoney to me. Go to Iowa and pretend you care all about ethanol...go somewhere else and pretend you care about their stuff. I'd rather see them on TV addressing all Americans as a whole.
Posted by: Sarah at January 06, 2008 04:17 AM (TWet1)
4
There's not an expectation of individual face time, but if a candidate didn't even go to an event in the state then it would follow that he (or she/it/whatever) isn't interested in the state.
Posted by: MP at January 06, 2008 05:14 AM (zXAER)
5
You mean the Presidential election wasn't decided by the Iowa caucus? Oh, crap. Now I *am* depressed -- I thought the election was over.
Posted by: Tracy at January 06, 2008 02:43 PM (gV2m7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HOORAY
The SpouseBUZZ
knit-along is complete!

Posted by: Sarah at
05:32 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 7 words, total size 1 kb.
1
How mucy to make me one?
Posted by: Oda Mae at January 05, 2008 11:54 AM (seLIA)
2
Oops, too much wine. How MUCH to make me one?
Posted by: Oda Mae at January 05, 2008 11:57 AM (seLIA)
3
You look beautiful! And the scarf isn't half bad either.
Posted by: Erin at January 05, 2008 12:22 PM (y67l2)
4
Amazing work. I saw the great work you and the others did over at SpouseBUZZ. Just incredible.
Posted by: Butterfly Wife at January 06, 2008 06:59 AM (K0acE)
Posted by: wendy at January 06, 2008 09:11 PM (56tHP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 04, 2008
HMMM
Remember when Halle Berry won her Oscar and the media crammed it down our throats that it was a major step for The United Racist States of America? How it was a major milestone for black people? That it somehow proved that we were healing as a nation from Jim Crow?
How come people aren't saying those things about Obama's win last night? Isn't being selected as the top Democrat in a ridiculously white state more groundbreaking than a black actress getting an award from her liberal peers?
I don't get it.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:53 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well that makes two of us....
confused over here at casa Soldier's Wife!
Posted by: A Soldier's Wife at January 04, 2008 07:53 PM (U2GKz)
2
Have you noticed that there are a large number of people on the left who say "I like him, but I won't vote for him because he is not 'electable' in racist America?"
Can you say projection?
Electing a black President will be horrible for the left; it will shatter the idea that America is racist and they will lose a constituency.
Posted by: Badger 6 at January 05, 2008 07:26 AM (PJY33)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HOW DELIGHTFULLY ABSURD
A comment my brain goes back to all the time came from Joe Willingham over at
Porphyrogenitus:
Somebody needs to do a study of learned (both in the one and two syllable versions of the word) stupidity, as opposed to the natural kind. Liberals today believe things that are remarkably stupid, such as that all people are equally intelligent at birth, or that there is no such thing as intelligence, or it there is then differences in intelligence are socially determined and have nothing to do with heredity. That all differences between the sexes are socially constructed. That social classes are the result of a sort of conspiracy and could be abolished if we voted in the right government. That all "cultures" are equal in value. That the reason the Third World is poor is because of the machinations of the corporations and the US government. That we kinda sorta deserved the attacks on 9-11 because we've hurt the Muslims' feelings with our insensitive attitudes.
Waitresses and truck drivers are smart enough not to believe such patent absurdities. The amazing thing is that the majority of English and social science professors and journalists do believe them.
This quote popped into my head again this morning when I read Amy Alkon's slaughter of a HuffPo post, some piece of crap that says that we are all terrorists deep down.
Only an intellectual could say something so stupid.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:16 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 242 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"Only an intellectual could say something so stupid."
Oh, I am so going to steal that from you and start using that as a snappy comeback, if I ever have the chance. That is so true and succinct. I wish I could have pulled that out of my hat in my university years where I was surrounded by "intellectuals" but it didn't seem that many had an ounce of common sense.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at January 04, 2008 05:12 AM (Ijp/q)
2
There's an old insult that goes, "Were you born that stupid, or did you have to study?" Increasingly, it seems that true stupidity requires having to study.
This phenomenon is closely related to
The Smart-Talk Trap; see also
this.
Posted by: david foster at January 04, 2008 05:34 AM (ke+yX)
3
Just choc full of great lines today, aren't you?
Posted by: airforcewife at January 04, 2008 07:22 AM (mIbWn)
4
Do you know the difference between ignorance and stupidity?
You can fix ignorance.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at January 05, 2008 03:48 PM (Z3kjO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
100kb generated in CPU 0.0544, elapsed 0.1757 seconds.
66 queries taking 0.1464 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.